Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) with 32% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(15 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight2 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management2 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework3 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
IM8-RES.3Incident Response
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan3 targets
IM8-RES.1Business Continuity Planning
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
IM8-RES.4Resilience Testing

Security Operations(5 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
IM8-SEC.3Network Security
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery3 targets
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
IM8-RES.3Incident Response
IM8-RES.4Resilience Testing
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 716 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 37 controls across its framework, while Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 7 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

Of 37 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 12 map directly to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

25 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.