ITAR — International Traffic in Arms RegulationsvsMiFID II / MiFIR
See exactly how ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls map to MiFID II / MiFIR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations maps to MiFID II / MiFIR with 22% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 126-127 — Exemptions, Violations and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Part 120 — Purpose and Definitions(2 mappings)
Part 123-125 — Licenses and Authorization(1 mappings)
Compliance Program(6 mappings)
Export Controls(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations comparisons
Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations and MiFID II / MiFIR?
ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 27 controls across its framework, while MiFID II / MiFIR covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 126-127 — Exemptions, Violations and Penalties, where 5 ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct MiFID II / MiFIR equivalent.
How many controls map between ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Of 27 total ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls, 6 map directly to MiFID II / MiFIR controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations to MiFID II / MiFIR?
21 ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct equivalent in MiFID II / MiFIR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 126-127 — Exemptions, Violations and Penalties with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ITAR — International Traffic in Arms Regulations and MiFID II / MiFIR?
The domain with the highest gap count is Part 126-127 — Exemptions, Violations and Penalties (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.