Cross-Framework Mapping

ITAR - International Traffic in Arms RegulationsvsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration

See exactly how ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

ITAR Compliance Program + Coord(2 mappings)

ITAR-CompliancProgram-ICP-EmpoweredOfficial-Recordkeeping-5Years-Training-IT-Cloud-SupplyChain-Coord-EAR-OFAC-WassenaarITAR Compliance Program + Internal Compliance Program (ICP) + Empowered Official + 5-Year Recordkeeping + Training + IT/Cloud (GovCloud + Azure Gov + GCC High) + Supply Chain + Coord EAR + OFAC + Wassenaar + MTCR2 targets
ISO-17025-8.1Options
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions

ITAR Scope + AECA + DDTC + USML(2 mappings)

ITAR-Scope-AECA-22USC2778-22CFR120-130-DDTC-USML-21Categories-DefenseArticle-Service-TechnicalDataITAR Scope + Arms Export Control Act (22 USC 2778) + 22 CFR Parts 120-130 + Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) + United States Munitions List (USML) 21 Categories + Defense Article/Service/Technical Data Definitions2 targets
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system

Related Comparisons

Other ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration?

ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political, where 1 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration equivalent.

How many controls map between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration?

Of 8 total ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration?

6 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration. The highest concentration of gaps is in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration?

The domain with the highest gap count is ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.