Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/SAE 21434vsISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

See exactly how ISO/SAE 21434 controls map to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
151
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/SAE 21434 maps to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles with 7% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 164 ISO/SAE 21434 controls identifies 171 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO/SAE 21434.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 164 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ISO/SAE 21434(1 mappings)

ISO21434-04Roles and responsibilities definition
→ISO-26262-3-5Item definition

Clause 5: Organizational cybersecurity management – ISO/SAE 21434(4 mappings)

iso-sae-21434::RQ-05-05[RQ-05-05] Interaction with related disciplines
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::2:5.4.25.4.2 Safety culture
iso-sae-21434::RQ-05-06[RQ-05-06] Cybersecurity culture2 targets
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::12:66 Safety culture
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::2:5.4.25.4.2 Safety culture
iso-sae-21434::RQ-05-14[RQ-05-14] Tool management
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::8:11.4.311.4.3 Software tool compliance with its evaluation criteria or its qualification

Clause 6: Project dependent cybersecurity management – ISO/SAE 21434(2 mappings)

iso-sae-21434::RQ-06-16[RQ-06-16] Reuse analysis content
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::2:6.4.46.4.4 Reuse of an existing element
iso-sae-21434::RQ-06-17[RQ-06-17] Reuse analysis for components
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::2:6.4.46.4.4 Reuse of an existing element

Clause 7: Distributed cybersecurity activities – ISO/SAE 21434(1 mappings)

iso-sae-21434::RQ-07-01[RQ-07-01] Supplier capability evaluation
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::8:5.4.25.4.2 Supplier selection criteria

Clause 9: Concept – ISO/SAE 21434(4 mappings)

iso-sae-21434::RQ-09-03[RQ-09-03] Risk analysis of the item
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::3:6.4.16.4.1 Initiation of the hazard analysis and risk assessment
iso-sae-21434::RQ-09-05[RQ-09-05] Cybersecurity goals
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::12:8.4.48.4.4 Determination of safety goals
iso-sae-21434::RQ-09-07[RQ-09-07] Verification of goals and claims
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::3:6.4.66.4.6 Verification
iso-sae-21434::RQ-09-11[RQ-09-11] Verification of the cybersecurity concept
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::3:7.4.47.4.4 Verification of the functional safety concept

Clause 15: Threat analysis and risk assessment methods – ISO/SAE 21434(1 mappings)

iso-sae-21434::RQ-15-06[RQ-15-06] Safety impact from ISO 26262
→iso-26262-2018-functional-safety-for-road-vehicles::3:6.4.36.4.3 Classification of hazardous events
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/SAE 21434 to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls your existing ISO/SAE 21434 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/SAE 21434 into ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles into ISO/SAE 21434
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/SAE 21434 to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 7% in the header counts how many ISO/SAE 21434 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/SAE 21434 and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

ISO/SAE 21434 has 164 controls across its framework, while ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles covers 206 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO/SAE 21434, where 49 ISO/SAE 21434 controls have no direct ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/SAE 21434 and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

Of 164 total ISO/SAE 21434 controls, 12 map directly to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls, representing 7% coverage. The remaining 171 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/SAE 21434 to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

171 ISO/SAE 21434 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO/SAE 21434 with 49 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/SAE 21434 and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO/SAE 21434 (49 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.