TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 42001:2023vsISO 22000:2018

See exactly how ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls map to ISO 22000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
45
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps to ISO 22000:2018 with 39% coverage across 31 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 80 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 80 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Annex A AIMS controls - A.8 Information for interested parties of AI systems(1 mappings)

A.8.4Communication of incidents
→iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication

Improvement – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(4 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement2 targets
→iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement
iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action2 targets
→iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(4 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-iec-42001-2023::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-iec-42001-2023::4.3Determining the scope of the management system
→iso-22000-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the food safety management system
iso-iec-42001-2023::4.4Management system
→iso-22000-2018::4.4Food safety management system

Leadership – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(3 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-iec-42001-2023::5.2Policy
→iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
iso-iec-42001-2023::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(2 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-iec-42001-2023::6.2Objectives and planning to achieve them
→iso-22000-2018::6.2Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them

Support – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(6 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::7.1Resources
→iso-22000-2018::7.1Resources
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.2Competence
→iso-22000-2018::7.2Competence
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.3Awareness
→iso-22000-2018::7.3Awareness
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.4Communication
→iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.5Documented information
→iso-22000-2018::7.5Documented information
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.5.1General
→iso-22000-2018::7.5.1General

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 42001:2023 comparisons

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 22301:201933 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 9001:201531 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 14001:201530 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 37001:201630 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 37301:202128 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27701:201928 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 45001:201827 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems23 mappings

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 22000:201855 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 22000:201842 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 22000:201837 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 22000:201836 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22000:201833 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems vs ISO 22000:201829 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 22000:2018?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 80 controls across its framework, while ISO 22000:2018 covers 70 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 31 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle, where 9 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct ISO 22000:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 22000:2018?

Of 80 total ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls, 31 map directly to ISO 22000:2018 controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to ISO 22000:2018?

49 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 22000:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.