TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 30111:2019vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW

See exactly how ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(2 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions
→CA-9Internal System Connections
30111-3Terms and definitions
→CA-9Internal System Connections

Clause 5: Vulnerability Handling Policy and Organization(1 mappings)

30111-5.1Organizational policy
→CA-9Internal System Connections

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 30111:2019 comparisons

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20226 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW5 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW4 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW4 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW4 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW4 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW4 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 has 34 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW covers 173 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process, where 5 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

Of 34 total ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 30111:2019 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

36 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.