Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 30111:2019vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 15% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(2 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
30111-3Terms and definitions
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Clause 5: Vulnerability Handling Policy and Organization(1 mappings)

30111-5.1Organizational policy
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Remediation Planning(1 mappings)

30111-6.5Remediation Strategy Selection
AWWA-4.2Patch Management

Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process(1 mappings)

30111-6.5Remediation Strategy Selection
AWWA-4.2Patch Management

Clause 7: Vendor Process Management(1 mappings)

30111-7.3Quality assurance of remediation
AWWA-4.2Patch Management

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 30111:2019 comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 has 34 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process, where 4 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 34 total ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls, 6 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 30111:2019 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

33 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.