Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 with 5% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Legal(1 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
CERTIN-IncidentReporting-6Hour-Mandatory-Format-POC-20Categories-Section70B-Dir1to4CERT-In Directions 1-4 Incident Reporting - Mandatory 6-Hour Window + 20 Categories + Standardised Report Format + Designated Point of Contact + 24x7 Channel

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(1 mappings)

29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
CERTIN-IncidentReporting-6Hour-Mandatory-Format-POC-20Categories-Section70B-Dir1to4CERT-In Directions 1-4 Incident Reporting - Mandatory 6-Hour Window + 20 Categories + Standardised Report Format + Designated Point of Contact + 24x7 Channel

Clause 1-4: Introduction(1 mappings)

30111-3Terms and definitions
CERTIN-IncidentReporting-6Hour-Mandatory-Format-POC-20Categories-Section70B-Dir1to4CERT-In Directions 1-4 Incident Reporting - Mandatory 6-Hour Window + 20 Categories + Standardised Report Format + Designated Point of Contact + 24x7 Channel

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 3 map directly to India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022?

45 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.