ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsIndia Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction(2 mappings)
Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons
Other India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?
ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts, where 8 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?
Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 3 map directly to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?
45 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.