Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsAutomotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(8 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions4 targets
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.3Machine Learning Training
MLE.3Machine Learning Training
30111-3Terms and definitions4 targets
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.3Machine Learning Training
MLE.3Machine Learning Training

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(4 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope4 targets
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.1Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.3Machine Learning Training
MLE.3Machine Learning Training

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts, where 8 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 3 map directly to Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model?

45 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 - Process Assessment Model?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.