TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance FrameworkvsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls map to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework maps to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges with 24% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 11-12: Mapping and Guidance(6 mappings)

29115-11Mapping other authentication schemes2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
29115-12.1Exchanging authentication results2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
29115-12.2Controls for mitigating threats2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Clause 1-4: Framework Introduction(1 mappings)

29115-3Terms and definitions
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs

Clause 7-8: Levels of Assurance(3 mappings)

29115-7.4Level of Assurance 4 (LoA4)3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework comparisons

ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs ISO/IEC 27400:20225 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)5 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)5 mappings

Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework has 21 controls across its framework, while MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance, where 4 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls have no direct MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

Of 21 total ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls, 5 map directly to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

16 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.