ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance FrameworkvsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls map to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework maps to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) with 24% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 11-12: Mapping and Guidance(6 mappings)
Clause 1-4: Framework Introduction(1 mappings)
Clause 7-8: Levels of Assurance(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework comparisons
Other New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework has 21 controls across its framework, while New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance, where 4 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls have no direct New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
Of 21 total ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls, 5 map directly to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
16 ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework controls have no direct equivalent in New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29115:2023 — Entity Authentication Assurance Framework and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 10: Criteria and Controls for Levels of Assurance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.