ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk ManagementvsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 24% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Treatment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
Clause 1-3: Introductory Provisions(5 mappings)
Clause 4: Principles of Privacy Risk Management(1 mappings)
Clause 6: Privacy Risk Management Process(5 mappings)
Clause 7: Privacy-Specific Risk Considerations(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management has 41 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Treatment, where 4 ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 41 total ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls, 8 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
33 ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Treatment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Treatment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.