Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsProposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) with 22% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(20 mappings)

27011-1Scope7 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art.2Scope
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
27011-3Terms and definitions7 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art.2Scope
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
27400-3Terms and definitions6 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art.2Scope

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Other Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls, where 5 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 8 map directly to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

34 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: IoT Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.