ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls, where 5 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 3 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
39 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: IoT Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.