Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27031:2011vsDORA

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 maps to DORA with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 9: Monitor and Review.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 4-5: Overview and IRBC Concepts(1 mappings)

27031-5.1Performance criteria definition
DORA-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Clause 7: IRBC Planning and Objectives(4 mappings)

27031-7.1Business continuity objectives for IRBC2 targets
DORA-11Business continuity planning and testing
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures
27031-7.2ICT risk assessment2 targets
DORA-11Business continuity planning and testing
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures

Clause 8: IRBC Implementation(5 mappings)

27031-8.1IRBC strategy implementation4 targets
DORA-11Business continuity planning and testing
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures
DORA-13Third-party dependency management
DORA-15Communication and escalation procedures
27031-8.2ICT response and recovery plans
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures

Clause 9: Monitor and Review(1 mappings)

27031-9.3Testing and exercises
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures

Annexes: Supporting Guidance(5 mappings)

27031-BHigh availability embedded systems3 targets
DORA-11Business continuity planning and testing
DORA-13Third-party dependency management
DORA-15Communication and escalation procedures
27031-DDeveloping performance criteria2 targets
DORA-11Business continuity planning and testing
DORA-12Disaster recovery procedures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and DORA?

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 has 22 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9: Monitor and Review, where 3 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct DORA equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and DORA?

Of 22 total ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls, 8 map directly to DORA controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27031:2011 to DORA?

14 ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9: Monitor and Review with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27031:2011 and DORA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9: Monitor and Review (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.