Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27019:2024vsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls map to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
51
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 maps to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines with 11% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls identifies 62 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27019:2024.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 878 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 878 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27019:2024(10 mappings)

ISO27019-13Network security monitoring
→MAS-TRM-Project-SDLC-Service-Management-Chapters-4-5-6-IT-Project-Software-Lifecycle-Change-ITILMAS TRM Project + SDLC + Service Management + Chapters 4-6 + IT Project + Software Lifecycle + ITIL
ISO27019-14System security hardening
→MAS-TRM-Access-Cryptography-Network-Security-Chapters-9-10-MFA-PKI-Encryption-Network-SegmentationMAS TRM Access Control + Cryptography + Network + Chapters 9-10 + MFA + PKI + Encryption + Network Segmentation
ISO27019-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions2 targets
→MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
→MAS-TRM-Reliability-Data-Centre-Chapters-7-8-RTO-RPO-BCP-DR-System-Availability-4-Hours-12-MonthsMAS TRM Reliability + Data Centre + Chapters 7-8 + RTO + RPO + BCP + DR + System Availability 4 Hours 12 Months
ISO27019-18Reporting obligations to authorities2 targets
→MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
→MAS-TRM-Reliability-Data-Centre-Chapters-7-8-RTO-RPO-BCP-DR-System-Availability-4-Hours-12-MonthsMAS TRM Reliability + Data Centre + Chapters 7-8 + RTO + RPO + BCP + DR + System Availability 4 Hours 12 Months
ISO27019-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents2 targets
→MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
→MAS-TRM-Reliability-Data-Centre-Chapters-7-8-RTO-RPO-BCP-DR-System-Availability-4-Hours-12-MonthsMAS TRM Reliability + Data Centre + Chapters 7-8 + RTO + RPO + BCP + DR + System Availability 4 Hours 12 Months
ISO27019-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
→MAS-TRM-Third-Party-IT-Audit-Chapters-14-15-Outsourcing-Notice-658-Concentration-Risk-Exit-StrategyMAS TRM Third Party + IT Audit + Chapters 14-15 + Outsourcing + Notice 658 + Concentration Risk + Exit Strategy
ISO27019-22Configuration management for OT systems
→MAS-TRM-Access-Cryptography-Network-Security-Chapters-9-10-MFA-PKI-Encryption-Network-SegmentationMAS TRM Access Control + Cryptography + Network + Chapters 9-10 + MFA + PKI + Encryption + Network Segmentation
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 27019:2024 to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls your existing ISO/IEC 27019:2024 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 into Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines into ISO/IEC 27019:2024
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 11% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27019:2024 comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 878 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 878 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27019:2024 and Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines?

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 has 61 controls across its framework, while Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27019:2024, where 39 ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls have no direct Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27019:2024 and Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines?

Of 61 total ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls, 7 map directly to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, representing 11% coverage. The remaining 62 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27019:2024 to Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines?

62 ISO/IEC 27019:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27019:2024 with 39 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27019:2024 and Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27019:2024 (39 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.