ISO/IEC 27007:2020vsGLBA
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls map to GLBA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27007:2020 maps to GLBA with 11% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Conducting an ISMS Audit.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 5: Managing an ISMS Audit Programme(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27007:2020 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27007:2020 and GLBA?
ISO/IEC 27007:2020 has 19 controls across its framework, while GLBA covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Conducting an ISMS Audit, where 5 ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls have no direct GLBA equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27007:2020 and GLBA?
Of 19 total ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls, 2 map directly to GLBA controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27007:2020 to GLBA?
17 ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls have no direct equivalent in GLBA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Conducting an ISMS Audit with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27007:2020 and GLBA?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Conducting an ISMS Audit (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.