Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27004:2016vsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls map to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27004:2016 maps to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Examples.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introductory Clauses(2 mappings)

27004-3Terms and definitions2 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling

Annex Examples(2 mappings)

27004-A.2Patching and Vulnerability Measures2 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling

Annex A: Information Security Measurement Model(2 mappings)

27004-A.2Patching and Vulnerability Measures2 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling

Annex B: Example Measurements(2 mappings)

27004-B.1Example measurement definitions2 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27004:2016 comparisons

Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

ISO/IEC 27004:2016 has 30 controls across its framework, while OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Examples, where 5 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

Of 30 total ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls, 4 map directly to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27004:2016 to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

41 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Examples with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Examples (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.