ISO/IEC 27004:2016vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27004:2016 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Examples.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introductory Clauses(1 mappings)
Annex Examples(1 mappings)
Annex A: Information Security Measurement Model(1 mappings)
Annex B: Example Measurements(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27004:2016 comparisons
Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
ISO/IEC 27004:2016 has 30 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Examples, where 5 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
Of 30 total ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls, 4 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27004:2016 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
41 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Examples with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Examples (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.