Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
64
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework with 11% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 64 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk

Operation (Clause 8)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
UKOPRES-3Self-Assessment and Board Engagement

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk

Planning (Clause 6)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
UKOPRES-3Self-Assessment and Board Engagement

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 8 map directly to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 64 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

64 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.