TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsISO/IEC 27014:2020

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to ISO/IEC 27014:2020. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
62
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to ISO/IEC 27014:2020 with 8% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→27014-5.6Continuous improvement
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
→27014-5.6Continuous improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→27014-5.6Continuous improvement

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(3 mappings)

ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS3 targets
→27014-1Scope
→27014-3Terms and definitions
→29134-3Terms and definitions

Planning (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities2 targets
→29134-1Scope
→29134-3Terms and definitions

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→29134-1Scope
→29134-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 9001:201541 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 14001:201534 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 14004:201628 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products14 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System13 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence11 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 13485:201610 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsIATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsAICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappingsISO 41001:2018 - Facility Management Systems vs ISO/IEC 27014:20205 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27014:2020 covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27014:2020 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

66 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27014:2020. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.