Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsISO/IEC 27014:2020

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to ISO/IEC 27014:2020. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to ISO/IEC 27014:2020 with 11% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
27014-5.6Continuous improvement
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
27014-5.6Continuous improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
27014-5.6Continuous improvement

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(3 mappings)

ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS3 targets
27014-1Scope
27014-3Terms and definitions
29134-3Terms and definitions

Planning (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities2 targets
29134-1Scope
29134-3Terms and definitions

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
29134-1Scope
29134-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27014:2020 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 57 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27014:2020 covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 13 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27014:2020 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

Of 57 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27014:2020 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

51 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27014:2020. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27014:2020?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.