TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality ModelvsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent and System-Dependent.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Inherent and System-Dependent Data Quality Characteristics(1 mappings)

ISO-25012-4.11Traceability
→PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model comparisons

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs UK AI Regulation Framework4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs OECD AI Principles4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs MTCS (Singapore)4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs Japan AI Guidelines4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappingsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model vs ISO 20000-14 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsAPI 1164 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO 27019 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsIEC 62443 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model has 36 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent and System-Dependent, where 7 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 36 total ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls, 1 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

35 ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent and System-Dependent with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent and System-Dependent (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.