TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key DistributionvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 32% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: Evaluation and Testing Methods.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 1-3: Introductory Provisions(9 mappings)

23837-1.1Scope
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
23837-1.2Normative references2 targets
→CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
27557-1Scope2 targets
→BMA-14Cyber Insurance
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
27557-3Terms and definitions4 targets
→BMA-14Cyber Insurance
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
→DS-1Security Safeguards
→DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls

Clause 5: Security Functional Requirements for Conventional Network Components(4 mappings)

23837-1.5.2Cryptographic module requirements2 targets
→CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
23837-1.5.3Network device testing requirements2 targets
→CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

Clause 7: Security Functional Requirements for QKD Protocol Implementation(3 mappings)

23837-1.7.3Authentication and classical post-processing3 targets
→CPG-1.ADefault Password Change
→CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
→CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution comparisons

ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20217 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs ETSI EN 303 6457 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs ISO/SAE 214347 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST SP 800-1287 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA)7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST SP 800-1837 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.023 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.023 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.021 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.020 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution has 22 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: Evaluation and Testing Methods, where 4 ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 22 total ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls, 7 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

15 ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: Evaluation and Testing Methods with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: Evaluation and Testing Methods (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.