ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and CalibrationvsISO/IEC TR 24028:2020
See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls map to ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration maps to ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Resource requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(1 mappings)
Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(1 mappings)
Management system requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration comparisons
Other ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020?
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration, where 20 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls have no direct ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020?
Of 41 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration to ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020?
38 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020. The highest concentration of gaps is in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020?
The domain with the highest gap count is Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.