ISO 56002vsSouth Korea ISMS-P
See exactly how ISO 56002 controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 56002 maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 7% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 138 ISO 56002 controls identifies 128 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 138 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 5: Leadership(1 mappings)
Clause 6: Planning(2 mappings)
Clause 10: Improvement(3 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the Organization(3 mappings)
Clause 8: Operations — Innovation Process(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 56002 comparisons
Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 56002 and South Korea ISMS-P?
ISO 56002 has 138 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 34 ISO 56002 controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 56002 and South Korea ISMS-P?
Of 138 total ISO 56002 controls, 10 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 128 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 56002 to South Korea ISMS-P?
128 ISO 56002 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 56002 and South Korea ISMS-P?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.