ISO 45003:2021vsANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant
See exactly how ISO 45003:2021 controls map to ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 45003:2021 maps to ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant with 68% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 ISO 45003:2021 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 9: Performance evaluation – ISO 45003:2021.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 control mappings across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
Clause 10: Improvement – ISO 45003:2021(4 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the organization – ISO 45003:2021(4 mappings)
Clause 5: Leadership and worker participation – ISO 45003:2021(8 mappings)
Clause 6: Planning – ISO 45003:2021(4 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 969 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A ISO 45003:2021 to ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant controls your existing ISO 45003:2021 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 68% in the header counts how many ISO 45003:2021 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 45003:2021 comparisons
Other ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 45003:2021 and ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant?
ISO 45003:2021 has 31 controls across its framework, while ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant covers 82 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (68% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9: Performance evaluation – ISO 45003:2021, where 2 ISO 45003:2021 controls have no direct ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 45003:2021 and ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant?
Of 31 total ISO 45003:2021 controls, 21 map directly to ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant controls, representing 68% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 45003:2021 to ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant?
10 ISO 45003:2021 controls have no direct equivalent in ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9: Performance evaluation – ISO 45003:2021 with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 45003:2021 and ANSI/ASIS WVPI AA-2020 Workplace Violence and Active Assailant?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9: Performance evaluation – ISO 45003:2021 (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.