ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of OrganizationsvsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 15% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enabling Principles: Data and Decisions, Risk Governance, Social Responsibility, Viability.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Enabling Principles: Data and Decisions, Risk Governance, Social Responsibility, Viability(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations has 26 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enabling Principles: Data and Decisions, Risk Governance, Social Responsibility, Viability, where 3 ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 26 total ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
24 ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enabling Principles: Data and Decisions, Risk Governance, Social Responsibility, Viability with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37000:2021 - Governance of Organizations and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enabling Principles: Data and Decisions, Risk Governance, Social Responsibility, Viability (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.