Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security ManagementvsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)

See exactly how ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls map to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management maps to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process and Procedural Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Supply Chain Security Assessment(1 mappings)

ISO28001-SA-04Security Risk Treatment Planning
OECDAI24-3Frontier Model Risk Management, Capability Disclosure, and Independent Evaluation

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons

Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management has 36 controls across its framework, while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process and Procedural Controls, where 4 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

Of 36 total ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls, 1 map directly to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

35 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct equivalent in OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). The highest concentration of gaps is in Process and Procedural Controls with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process and Procedural Controls (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.