TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsMITRE ATT&CK

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to MITRE ATT&CK. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to MITRE ATT&CK with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(4 mappings)

ISO27799-01ePHI access controls and authorization2 targets
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures
ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access
→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt

ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-08Information access management2 targets
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures

ISO 27799: Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-12Unique user identification and authentication
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption
→MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control

ISO 27799: Physical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO27799-17Facility access controls2 targets
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27799 comparisons

ISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-6612 mappingsISO 27799 vs MDS2 (Medical Device)12 mappingsISO 27799 vs MARS-E12 mappingsISO 27799 vs ISO 1348512 mappingsISO 27799 vs NIST Privacy Framework11 mappingsISO 27799 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsISO 27799 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework10 mappings

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 27043 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 13485 vs MITRE ATT&CK5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and MITRE ATT&CK?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while MITRE ATT&CK covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards, where 5 ISO 27799 controls have no direct MITRE ATT&CK equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and MITRE ATT&CK?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 7 map directly to MITRE ATT&CK controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to MITRE ATT&CK?

39 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in MITRE ATT&CK. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and MITRE ATT&CK?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.