Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27701:2019vsCIS Controls v8

See exactly how ISO 27701:2019 controls map to CIS Controls v8. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

307
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
53%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27701:2019 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27701:2019 maps to CIS Controls v8 with 53% coverage across 73 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls identifies 72 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers, ISO 27701:2019.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 108 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 307 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

PIMS-specific requirements related to ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 27701:2019(20 mappings)

iso-27701-2019::5.2.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties4 targets
CIS-14.1Establish and Maintain a Security Awareness Program
CIS-15.1Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Providers
CIS-17.2Establish and Maintain Contact Information for Reporting Security Incidents
CIS-3.8Document Data Flows
iso-27701-2019::5.3.2Policy
CIS-15.2Establish and Maintain a Service Provider Management Policy
iso-27701-2019::5.3.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
CIS-17.5Assign Key Roles and Responsibilities
iso-27701-2019::5.4.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
CIS-7.2Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process
iso-27701-2019::5.5.2Competence2 targets
CIS-14.9Conduct Role-Specific Security Awareness and Skills Training
CIS-16.9Train Developers in Application Security Concepts and Secure Coding
iso-27701-2019::5.5.3Awareness8 targets
CIS-14.1Establish and Maintain a Security Awareness Program
CIS-14.2Train Workforce Members to Recognize Social Engineering Attacks
CIS-14.3Train Workforce Members on Authentication Best Practices
CIS-14.5Train Workforce Members on Causes of Unintentional Data Exposure
CIS-14.6Train Workforce Members on Recognizing and Reporting Security Incidents
CIS-14.7Train Workforce on How to Identify and Report if Their Enterprise Assets are Missing Security Updates
CIS-14.8Train Workforce on the Dangers of Connecting to and Transmitting Enterprise Data Over Insecure Networks
CIS-14.9Conduct Role-Specific Security Awareness and Skills Training
iso-27701-2019::5.5.4Communication
CIS-17.6Define Mechanisms for Communicating During Incident Response
iso-27701-2019::5.5.5Documented information2 targets
CIS-12.4Establish and Maintain Architecture Diagram(s)
CIS-3.1Establish and Maintain a Data Management Process

+287 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27701:2019 to CIS Controls v8 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CIS Controls v8 controls your existing ISO 27701:2019 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27701:2019 into CIS Controls v8
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

CIS Controls v8 into ISO 27701:2019
25%

27 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 81 are genuine gaps.

61.1%PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 27701:2019
12.9%Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers, ISO 27701:2019
5.6%Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII processors, ISO 27701:2019
0%PIMS-specific requirements related to ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 27701:2019
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 200 candidate mappings were examined and 110 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 6.10.1 Network security management

Filtering between segments delivers segregation in networks.

Grounded in CIS-13.4 Perform Traffic Filtering Between Network Segments. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.1 General

Every requirement of ISO/IEC 27001 that speaks of information security must be read as extending to the protection of privacy as it may be affected by the processing of personally identifiable information, so the management system is...

Every one of the 27 evidenced controls and 81 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

CIS Controls v8 to ISO 27701:2019
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 53% in the header counts how many ISO 27701:2019 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CIS Controls v8 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27701:2019 and CIS Controls v8?

ISO 27701:2019 has 108 controls across its framework, while CIS Controls v8 covers 153 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 73 overlapping controls (53% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers, ISO 27701:2019, where 25 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct CIS Controls v8 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27701:2019 and CIS Controls v8?

Of 108 total ISO 27701:2019 controls, 73 map directly to CIS Controls v8 controls, representing 53% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27701:2019 to CIS Controls v8?

72 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in CIS Controls v8. The highest concentration of gaps is in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers, ISO 27701:2019 with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27701:2019 and CIS Controls v8?

The domain with the highest gap count is Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers, ISO 27701:2019 (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.