Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017vsNIST SP 1800-32

See exactly how ISO 27017 controls map to NIST SP 1800-32. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017 maps to NIST SP 1800-32 with 24% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 27017 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud-specific.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27017: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

ISO27017-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment
NIST1800-32-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

ISO 27017: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud
NIST1800-32-02System security categorization
ISO27017-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities
NIST1800-32-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NIST1800-32-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

ISO 27017: Cloud Infrastructure Security(5 mappings)

ISO27017-16Virtual network segmentation
NIST1800-32-13Network security monitoring
ISO27017-19Image and template hardening2 targets
NIST1800-32-14System security hardening
NIST1800-32-22Configuration management for OT systems
ISO27017-20Cloud configuration management2 targets
NIST1800-32-14System security hardening
NIST1800-32-22Configuration management for OT systems

ISO 27017: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(5 mappings)

ISO27017-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
NIST1800-32-13Network security monitoring
ISO27017-22Incident response in cloud3 targets
NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities
NIST1800-32-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NIST1800-32-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
ISO27017-24Cloud change management
NIST1800-32-23Change management procedures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 1800-32?

ISO 27017 has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 1800-32 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud-specific, where 7 ISO 27017 controls have no direct NIST SP 1800-32 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 1800-32?

Of 37 total ISO 27017 controls, 9 map directly to NIST SP 1800-32 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017 to NIST SP 1800-32?

28 ISO 27017 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 1800-32. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud-specific with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 1800-32?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud-specific (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.