ISO 27005vsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)
See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27005 maps to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO 27005 controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISO 27005: Risk Framework & Governance(2 mappings)
ISO 27005: Risk Monitoring & Review(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27005 comparisons
Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
ISO 27005 has 40 controls across its framework, while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 27005 controls have no direct OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27005 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
Of 40 total ISO 27005 controls, 3 map directly to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
23 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27005: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.