ISO 27005vsISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems
See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27005 maps to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems with 12% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO 27005 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
ISO 27005: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)
ISO 27005: Risk Monitoring & Review(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27005 comparisons
Other ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?
ISO 27005 has 40 controls across its framework, while ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems covers 167 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 8 ISO 27005 controls have no direct ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27005 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?
Of 40 total ISO 27005 controls, 4 map directly to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?
36 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.