ISO 27002:2022vsCNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG)
See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27002:2022 maps to CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG) with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 94 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 93 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 94 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Other CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG)?
ISO 27002:2022 has 94 controls across its framework, while CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 33 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG)?
Of 94 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 1 map directly to CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG) controls — representing 1% coverage. The remaining 93 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG)?
93 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG). The highest concentration of gaps is in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and CNCF Security Technical Advisory Group (TAG)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.