Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
70
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 21% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 75 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(16 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance2 targets
ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
ISMSP-AC-02User Account Management
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties2 targets
ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
ISO27001-A.5.30Technology readiness for business recovery
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation

A.7 Physical Controls(1 mappings)

ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management

A.8 Technological Controls(3 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance2 targets
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ISO27001-A.8.15Audit trail and event logging
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and South Korea ISMS-P?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 27 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 20 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 75 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to South Korea ISMS-P?

75 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.