Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
80
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 with 9% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 86 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(7 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management2 targets
LLM02-2025Sensitive Information Disclosure
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
LLM03-2025Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
LLM03-2025Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
LLM03-2025Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
LLM02-2025Sensitive Information Disclosure

A.8 Technological Controls(8 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities3 targets
LLM05-2025Improper Output Handling
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance3 targets
LLM05-2025Improper Output Handling
LLM06-2025Excessive Agency
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage
ISO27001-A.8.5Strong authentication mechanisms2 targets
LLM02-2025Sensitive Information Disclosure
LLM07-2025System Prompt Leakage

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 33 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 9 map directly to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 86 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

86 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.