Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

287
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
86%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW with 86% coverage across 86 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 100 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 100 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 287 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information security14 targets
AC-1Policy and Procedures
AT-1Policy and Procedures
AU-1Policy and Procedures
CA-1Policy and Procedures
CM-1Policy and Procedures
CM-11User-Installed Software
MA-1Policy and Procedures
PL-1Policy and Procedures
PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
PS-1Policy and Procedures
RA-1Policy and Procedures
SC-1Policy and Procedures
SI-1Policy and Procedures
SR-1Policy and Procedures (SR-1)
iso-27001-2022::5.10Acceptable use of information and other associated assets4 targets
AC-8System Use Notification
CM-10Software Usage Restrictions
MP-7Media Use
PL-4Rules of Behavior
iso-27001-2022::5.11Return of assets
PS-4Personnel Termination
iso-27001-2022::5.12Classification of information
AC-22Publicly Accessible Content

+267 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW controls your existing ISO 27001:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27001:2022 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW into ISO 27001:2022
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 86% in the header counts how many ISO 27001:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

ISO 27001:2022 has 100 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW covers 173 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 86 overlapping controls (86% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022, where 5 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

Of 100 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 86 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW controls, representing 86% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

14 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022 with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9 – ISO 27001:2022 (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.