Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
100
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 3% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 115 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(6 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management2 targets
LkSG-Sec6-Policy-PreventiveSection 6 Policy Statement and Preventive Measures (Own + Direct Suppliers)
LkSG-Sec7-IndirectSupplier-Sec8-RemedialSection 7 Indirect Supplier DD + Substantiated Knowledge Trigger + Section 8 Remedial Action
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts2 targets
LkSG-Sec6-Policy-PreventiveSection 6 Policy Statement and Preventive Measures (Own + Direct Suppliers)
LkSG-Sec7-IndirectSupplier-Sec8-RemedialSection 7 Indirect Supplier DD + Substantiated Knowledge Trigger + Section 8 Remedial Action
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring2 targets
LkSG-Sec6-Policy-PreventiveSection 6 Policy Statement and Preventive Measures (Own + Direct Suppliers)
LkSG-Sec7-IndirectSupplier-Sec8-RemedialSection 7 Indirect Supplier DD + Substantiated Knowledge Trigger + Section 8 Remedial Action

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 36 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 3 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 115 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

115 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 36 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (36 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.