Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsCNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) with 39% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(10 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
DEP-4Host Suitability Validation
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
DEP-4Host Suitability Validation
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest

Access Control and Authentication(10 mappings)

CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
CJIS-6Account Management
DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ICS-AC-3Account management2 targets
DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

Other CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 64 controls across its framework, while CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 11 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

Of 64 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 25 map directly to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

39 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.