ISO 27001:2022vsChina Cybersecurity Law (CSL)
See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27001:2022 maps to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) with 2% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 116 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.
A.5 Organizational Controls(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Other China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 704 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?
ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 37 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?
Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 2 map directly to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 116 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?
116 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 37 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (37 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.