ISO 27001:2022vsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)
See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27001:2022 maps to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) with 2% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 118 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 39 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 0 map directly to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 118 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
118 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 39 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?
The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (39 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.