Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 26000:2010vsJordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)

See exactly how ISO 26000:2010 controls map to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
58
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 26000:2010 maps to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 ISO 26000:2010 controls identifies 59 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 6: Core Subjects - Fair Operating Practices, Consumer Issues, Community Involvement (6.6-6.8)(2 mappings)

ISO-26000-6.7Consumer issues2 targets
JO-PDPL-Personal-Data-Protection-Council-Article4-5-6-Establishment-MoDEE-Functions-Powers-InvestigationJordan PDPL Personal Data Protection Council + Articles 4-5-6 + Establishment + Ministry of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship (MoDEE) + Functions + Powers + Investigation + Administrative Penalties + Council Composition + International Cooperation
JO-PDPL-Training-Awareness-Penalties-Article22-23-24-Compensation-Administrative-Criminal-100K-200K-JODJordan PDPL Training + Awareness + Penalties + Articles 22-23-24 + Compensation + Administrative Penalties JOD 100K + JOD 200K Repeat + Criminal 3 Years + Civil Compensation + Director Liability + Reasonable Care Defence

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 26000:2010 comparisons

Other Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 26000:2010 and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

ISO 26000:2010 has 60 controls across its framework, while Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility, where 8 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 26000:2010 and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

Of 60 total ISO 26000:2010 controls, 1 map directly to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 26000:2010 to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

59 ISO 26000:2010 controls have no direct equivalent in Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 26000:2010 and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Social Responsibility (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.