Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22318vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 22318 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22318 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 22318 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 22318: Business Continuity Strategy(2 mappings)

ISO22318-14Supply chain continuity2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22318 comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22318 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 22318 has 36 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising, where 5 ISO 22318 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22318 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 36 total ISO 22318 controls, 1 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22318 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

35 ISO 22318 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22318 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.