ISO 22317vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
See exactly how ISO 22317 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22317 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 22317 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 22317: BCM Testing & Exercising.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
ISO 22317: Business Impact Analysis(3 mappings)
ISO 22317: Business Continuity Strategy(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22317 comparisons
Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22317 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
ISO 22317 has 36 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 22317: BCM Testing & Exercising, where 5 ISO 22317 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22317 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
Of 36 total ISO 22317 controls, 5 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22317 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
31 ISO 22317 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 22317: BCM Testing & Exercising with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22317 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 22317: BCM Testing & Exercising (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.