Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management SystemsvsISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

See exactly how ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls map to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
163
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems maps to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles with 2% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 167 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls identifies 163 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 167 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 8: Operation(1 mappings)

ISO-22313-8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
ISO-26262-3-7Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)

Clause 4: Context of the Organization(3 mappings)

ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons

Other ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems has 167 controls across its framework, while ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles covers 69 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 34 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

Of 167 total ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls, 4 map directly to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 163 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

163 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.