ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management SystemsvsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience
See exactly how ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls map to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems maps to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience with 8% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 145 ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls identifies 133 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 145 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 5: Leadership(1 mappings)
Clause 6: Planning(2 mappings)
Clause 8: Operation(3 mappings)
Clause 10: Improvement(9 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the Organization(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons
Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems has 145 controls across its framework, while BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 34 ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
Of 145 total ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls, 12 map directly to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 133 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems to BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
133 ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22313:2020 — Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.