Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20000-1vsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how ISO 20000-1 controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20000-1 maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 11% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO 20000-1 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation(1 mappings)

9.1Risk communication and consultation
PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working

ISO 20000-1: Service Operation(2 mappings)

ISO20000-11Incident management
PASONE-6Incident Management, Audit, Handover, Operational Phase, Decommissioning
ISO20000-15Access management for services
PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 20000-1 and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

ISO 20000-1 has 27 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design, where 5 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20000-1 and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 27 total ISO 20000-1 controls, 3 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20000-1 to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

24 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20000-1 and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.