TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20000-1vsMITRE ATT&CK

See exactly how ISO 20000-1 controls map to MITRE ATT&CK. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20000-1 maps to MITRE ATT&CK with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 51 ISO 20000-1 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 51 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Planning(1 mappings)

6.3Information security awareness, education and training
→MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container

Performance Evaluation(2 mappings)

9.1Risk communication and consultation
→MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control
9.2Internal Audit
→MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container

ISO 20000-1: Service Operation(2 mappings)

ISO20000-15Access management for services2 targets
→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20000-1 comparisons

ISO 20000-1 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes8 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO 190118 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence7 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20177 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs MTCS (Singapore)7 mappings

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 27043 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsISO 13485 vs MITRE ATT&CK5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 20000-1 and MITRE ATT&CK?

ISO 20000-1 has 51 controls across its framework, while MITRE ATT&CK covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design, where 5 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct MITRE ATT&CK equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20000-1 and MITRE ATT&CK?

Of 51 total ISO 20000-1 controls, 4 map directly to MITRE ATT&CK controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20000-1 to MITRE ATT&CK?

47 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct equivalent in MITRE ATT&CK. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20000-1 and MITRE ATT&CK?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 20000-1: Service Strategy & Design (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.